A Mammoth on the Metro

Last week, construction workers unearthed the remains of a woolly giant while expanding Los Angeles’ (California) Purple [Metro] Line. They took great care and stopped construction so that paleontologists could assess the fossils, jacket them, and remove them to the safety of a lab. The fossils will end up at the Natural History Museum of LA County.

But what did they find? The workers found a three-foot section of tusk and mastodon tooth fragments. When the paleontologists started working, they found a partial skull with tusks of a younger individual. These parts belonged to either a mammoth or a mastodon.


Dr. Ashley Leger (left) and Bethany Ader (right) excavating the fossil. From LA Metro.

You might be wondering what the difference is between a mammoth and a mastodon. After all, they’re both large, extinct elephants. A mammoth has teeth that are intended for consuming grass. Grass has little beads of sand (silica) embedded in its fibers, so eating it requires teeth that can grind down the fiber. Silica is very tough and can wear down teeth, so animals that eat grass have to have very tall teeth (called high crowned) so that as the tooth wears down, more tooth is available for chewing. Mastodons ate mostly leaves, fruits, and other plant material, but no grass. Their teeth could be shorter (called low crowned) and had larger bumps (cusps) to break up the plants.


A mastodon tooth on the left and a mammoth tooth on the right. Photo from Bluff Country Fossils.

Both mammoths and mastodons are found in many places in North America because during the last ice age (around 24,000 years ago) the climate and habitat in North America was much cooler and drier than it is today. They started to go extinct as the climate warmed up, though their exact cause is unknown. One population of mammoths did survive much longer than the others, on an Alaskan island – you can read more about them [here].

For now, the fossils are safe. As workers find more fossils, we may understand more about this population of extinct elephants.

The Island Mammoths and the Sea

This week we’re going to talk about an [article] that’s so new, it doesn’t even have page numbers yet. The purpose of this study was to find out why a population of mammoths on the island of Saint Paul, Alaska went extinct. But first, let’s talk about mammoths.

Mammoths were large elephants that were covered in thick fur. They are most closely related to Asian elephants. Mammoths had teeth adapted to grinding, similar to modern horses, for eating grass and other plants. The last mammoths went extinct about 4000 years ago (that’s 2000 BCE). To put that in perspective, the earliest Egyptian pyramids were built around 2600 BCE. The Egyptians were building pyramids while the last mammoths were still roaming the tundra. Let that sink in for a minute.

mammoth PBS

An artist rendition of a mammoth (from PBS).

The authors of this study traveled to Saint Paul, Alaska: a tiny island that’s over 450 km (280 miles) away from Alaska and the Aleutian Islands.

Screen Shot 2016-08-08 at 4.13.39 PM

A map showing the location of Saint Paul Island, Alaska (the red marker) (from Google).

They took sediment core samples from the deepest lake on the island, Lake Hill. What’s a sediment core, you might ask? A sediment core is a sample of sediment or dirt that is gathered by drilling a deep hole. As the drill comes back up it is filled with a sample, or core, of the sediment from that spot. Because sediment is deposited in layers over time, these cores contain information about what the conditions were like in that place over time.

sediment core

A photo of a sediment core from a lake (photo by N. Krug).

The authors tested the cores for the presence of DNA and three fungal spores. The fungi they tested for are types that eat animal poop, so their presence in the cores will tell us that there were animals in that spot. The authors also tested the cores for plants, tiny invertebrates, pollen, and isotopes (chemicals that tell us about the environment) to understand how the environment was changing over the last 10,000 years.

Using all of these data, the authors found out that:

  • The ice melting at the end of the Ice Age was raising sea level and causing Saint Paul island to shrink.
  • Fresh water on the island was disappearing because the rising sea level invaded ground water and lakes.
  • Mammoth activity around the lake destroyed the plants around the lake and caused more sediment to fall in to the water, filling the lake with sediment and causing the lake to disappear faster.
  • These mammoths probably died of thirst around 5600 years ago.

These conclusions bring up a point that we all need to pay attention to: as sea level rises, the amount of freshwater on islands will drop. That means many of the Pacific Island nations, among others, are immediately in danger from sea level rise, not only from shrinking space, but also from losing freshwater sources. As sea level continues to rise, we will have many concerns about resources and population. Those who say global climate change is a myth are choosing to ignore a global problem that is already affecting us.

Studying extinct animals, like this Mammoth population on Saint Paul Island, can help us understand how climate change will affect us in the years to come.